As a law enforcement professional I strongly support the right of a citizen to carry a firearm for protection of themselves and others. I believe that this is not only a right but a responsibility that should be taken very seriously. You are ultimately responsible for the safety of yourself and your family.
Don't let anyone tell you that the police are responsible for your safety because that simply is not true. When I started in law enforcement we averaged about 1 officer for every 1200 citizens. Now that number is more like 1 officer for every 1500. Can you ensure the safety of 1500 people? Neither can I. Also remember that of those 1500 people that need protection a significant number of them are criminals who will not cooperate with you and will actively try to harm the others. Try to remember that the original and often forgotten role of the police is to punish those who break the law. Working in a bad part of town this really becomes clear when you go days on end without ever having any contact with a decent, law abiding citizen. But I am getting off topic.
I remember in my patrol car driving days when I would make a traffic stop and make the gut wrenching walk to the drivers window. If you think you are nervous when you get pulled over, think about what its like from the other end. Not only are you worried about what the occupants of the car are doing (reaching for a gun, hiding dope, getting ready to run) but also about the cars coming up behind you that can kill you just as dead as a bullet but, YOU CANNOT LOOK OUT FOR THEM because you can't take your eyes of the occupants of the car you just pulled over.
Imagine the relief when the driver hands you a drivers license and a CCW permit. Those two things tell you a lot about a person. One, I can know for certain who this person is and two, this person has subjected themselves to a criminal background check and the State has said yes, we trust you with a concealed weapon. This is probably not a bad guy here.
I know for me personally these folks were usually handed back their drivers license and CCW permit, thanked for taking responsibility for their own safety and sent on their way. I know for me a traffic stop was never about just writting a ticket, but about finding the bad folks so I could help them get into jail. A traffic violation is a little thing that helps you find the big things.
In the years I have been in law enforcement I have had only one bad encounter with a CCW holder. But he was also a private investigator.......and he was drunk. But that story is best left for some other time.
Update 07/14/08: I see from the comments that I have caused some controversy over my assertion that the original role of the police is to punish those that break the law. I fear that I have misspoke. That thought would be better expressed "bring to punishment" those that break the law. Please see the insightful commentary from JPG in the comments. I agree that punishment of offenders is reserved for the judiciary although I do feel that it is so far removed from the commission of the offense that the offender may not even associate the two. Often the only "perceived" punishment that offenders recognize is the inconvenience of getting caught, going to jail, getting interrogated by a detective or getting a warrant issued for them. I should have been more careful in my wording.
Zombieland Rule No. 4
-
DoubletapTallahassee - "God Bless Rednecks"The movie was awesome! I'm off to Farmer Frank's to scout out my whitetail hunting site. If you haven't seen th...

24 comments:
Wow. Another Peace Officer, rather than an LEO. If only we had more like you, Matt G and Lawdog.
So far, I like your style. I hope you have a lot more to say. Thank you for what you do, sir.
Welcome to the blogosphere!
My decision to move to Texas a few years ago has been validated yet again by this post.
Glad you're in my city, sir!
I like CHLs because they save me time. No need to run a 43, because they've been checked. I will always ask if they're armed. When they respond that they are not (about 60% of the time!), I ask gently "why not?"
Yet another good lead from the Lawdog. Indeed, I've no idea how folks manage to do the job.
And yes, the lovely ballet of watching the driver, any passengers as well as the traffic flying by is a difficult dance to master.
Stay safe...
I love your attitude about CCW holders! But I realize not all cops share that view.
Once I was pulled over by a very polite and professional officer. But his whole tone and demeanor changed for the worse the moment he spotted my CCW.
Thank you for what you do, and thanks for the honesty. Looking forward to reading more of your writings!
Hello, Cowtown Cop.
Welcome to the blogosphere, and especially to the ranks of North Texas Po-leeces with a burning need to blather. No slight intended - - Unless we are truly gifted philosophers or humoroists, that's what most of us do: Ramble on at length about whatever topic catches our eye that particular day. You've already proven you have a good eye and ear, and made good choices for some of your early efforts.
You've been indeed blessed by attracting the attention of the redoubtable LawDog. I sneaked a look at your SiteMeter and it cofirmed my expectations: A nod in his blog is worth a huge but-- uh, BUSHEL of referrals. I know that's how I came to be aware of your blog, and I'm certainly not alone!
I was born in FTW, lived elsewhere through high school, returned to attend TCU, and began peace officering in Tarrant County. I still love the area.
I'll look forward to visiting back and forth, and hope to meet you sometime.
All best
JPG
As a CHL holder, I appreciate your attitude. In the 11 years I've had my CHL, I've had to present it to TX officers 3 or 4 times. I am PROUD to say NONE of them reacted adversely to learning I was carrying while driving.
In fact, I even TRIED to give my handgun to a THP officer since I was about to be transported to an ER and didn't want to violate the law. He told me not to worry about it. "Just keep it concealed as best you can. Then you can give it to your husband when he gets to the hospital. You'll be OK."
On another note...having been the recent beneficiary of a "Dawgalanche"... ain't it GRAND what a link from the LawDog will do for your site meter? That spike on the graph will last for about 3-4 days.
Keep writing quality posts like what I've rea so far and you'll keep a lot of these folks as regular readers.
Good luck!
Just found your site via lawdog.
And I love this quote: "A traffic violation is a little thing that helps you find the big things."
I'll be using that myself now...
Incidentally, where I'm working at the moment we're managing about one copper for every 15,000 residents. Yes, thats one for every fifteen thousand.
It's fun all the way!
Hey. Lawdog said I should come by and say hi. Based on what I've read I'm probably gonna be sticking around. Thanks.
Welcome to the blogosphere, Cowtown Cop. Now I miss Texas more than ever! ;)
Matt G, similar situation for me. I was stopped for speeding (45 in a 35 zone). The officer saw on my driver's license that I had a CCW and asked if I was armed. I told him no, I'd just come from the Doc's for my 6th month vampire session (blood draw for chloesterol) and it was in the neighboring state where my CCW wasn't recognized.
The officer suggested perhaps I should look for another Doc. :-)
Still got a ticket, though.
Got to your blog by way of Matt G and LawDog.
When I get pulled over at night, by the time the cop gets out of his car, I have the dome light on, window down, hands on the wheel holding my license. I'm also pulled off as far as I can. I do it partially to be in good graces with the officer, but mainly because I can only IMAGINE how scary it must be for the cop. I would hate to pull over a car on a dark, empty road. Like you've said, you have no idea who is in that car....
Thanks for doing your job.
Good post.
James
Quote: Try to remember that the original and often forgotten role of the police is to punish those who break the law.
CC, that concept troubles me, and I must disagree. With all due respect, and to air another point of view, though - - -
In the modern United States, it is the function of the police to preserve the public peace, NOT to administer punishment. To stop the commission of crimes, and restore order, surely. But if an individual cop is to inflict punishment, it may be hard to know where to stop. What sort is appropriate? An open-handed strike? Perhaps a beating with fists? Should the offender be “tuned up” with a baton or an ASP? Or given a series of Taser jolts, appropriate to the infraction? As of now, each of these options may be used, WITHIN LIMITS, to subdue a violent suspect and obtain compliance with lawful orders or submission to a lawful arrest. If misused, any or all may come to be far more restricted than currently.
The street cop, exercising discretion, may merely issue a simple warning. If the violator must go to court, a summons may be issued, or in more immediate cases, he may be jailed pending appearance before a judge. Assessing punishment is a function of the judiciary. It may require payment of a fine, some probated sentence, or even confinement. Whatever is assessed by a judge, physical violence is NOT within the range of punishment.
Best,
JPG
Keep this up and you will get bookmarked just like Mr. LD, JPG and Matt G., checked frequently and forwarded on to friends who will also appreciate your postings.
Welcome to the blogosphere, too.
And thanks for your take on the issue. Hope you won't mind another perspective.
I know quite a few cops. For the past couple of years, I've been doing the HR218 training for all of the retired guys for a well-respected local-to-me department, and it's been an utter blast. (The training sessions are kind of a Homecoming Week for lots of them, many of whom have gone in various and sundry different directions since they pulled the pin.) Terrific folks; I like them a lot.
And I've met a few who, well, are a waste of protoplasm.
I say that as a preface to a different perspective: when I see the lights go on in my rear view mirror, and pull over (which happens from time to time, although not often), and a man or woman comes up to my window, the only thing I know is that he or she has a badge and a gun. Good, service-oriented cop who is just doing business? Maybe. Arrogant thumper who is thinking with his/her badge? Maybe; I dunno.
In my state, if they ask as to whether or not I'm carrying, I'm legally obligated to mention (and, if requested, produce) my permit and firearm. That's easy.
Otherwise? Well, the only thing I'm sure about is that I haven't been pulled over for my benefit, and since I don't know if what I've got is a good, service-oriented cop like yourself, or some bozo with a badge like, say, ex-Sergeant James Kuehnlein of St. George MO -- and since I can't tell at a glance -- I'm just going to keep the voice recorder going discreetly, not get involved in any unnecessary discussions about anything, and hope to be on my way as quickly as possible, and decide what to do about a ticket later.
Nothing personal, mind. Just business.f=
@ JPG
What's your point and what does it have to do with CCW?
djk asked, "What's your point and what does it have to do with CCW?"
The sixth sentence in the second paragraph of CC's entry about "CCW permits" -- the topic on which we are currently commenting. I quoted his sentence at the start of my comment.
CC made the statement. I quoted him, and commented on my disagreement. I gave my reasoning, at some length. This is how discussions work. If CC -- or you -- disagree with my reasoning, I'll read wth interest.
As to the original topic of the post, CC and I seem to be in near-total agreement. I took the DPS Concealed Handgun License Instructors' course and was teaching students before the initial licenses went into effect. I taught for several years and was proud to make my small contribution to promoting the cause of well trained, legally armed private citizens in Texas.
JPG
@JPG
Sorry about that... I guess what I didn't realize was that your comment was the second part of a sort of two parter. That would explain my confusion.
I thought you on a rant about punishment and hadn't in any way tied it to the CCW. Also, I was reading from the bottom up and never made it to your previous post/s...
Great blog. Nice to see another law enforcement guy that's pro citizen, pro constitution and pro gun. I'm a prosecutor in Amarillo, and I lived for quite a few years in Cowtown.
I'll be stopping by a bit more often....
I would just like to say thanks for what you do. I very much appreciated your comment about having a little more confidence in a person you pull over that hands you a concealed permit. I too carry one but have yet to be pulled over. The last time that happened was over a decade ago. I'm hoping it doesn't happen any time soon but you eased my apprehension of that moment if it does.
As a CHL holder I certainly like seeing your perspective on people like me. I got it simply for the fact that I want to protect my family and myself. While I do not always carry on my person, there is always a pistol in my truck...just habit now.
Thanks for being an officer and thanks for the blog.
Just wanted to say thank you.
You are not alone. Of three official stops I have had as a CCW holder, all three went well.
Your addendum is eloquent and appreciated as well. You are blogrolled again sir!
Post a Comment